When accompanying other in the first contact with spirit guides, the question is often asked if we could not be us who are making it up. There are always people who are afraid of feeling stupid and invent and therefore can not let a leak and hand overs conversations on paper. Faced with these questions I try to explain that we are always in effect that we are inventing, making and using the imagination to contact the highest parts of our consciousness, through which the spirits guide can communicate with us and give us not only general messages about our life, but real technical teaching. When they do that by talking with my (as Igor wittily called spirit guides) I show them some knowledge that I had and then turns out to be right in reality, I am always very impressed, and since the frequency of these events continues to increase and accuracy becomes more and more, I decided to ask some explanations to them and this is what came out:
(IO) "But then you know everything everything?"
(They) "Yes and no. In theory you would know everything if I let you be a little 'more, but only recently we're leaving to be, whereas before you were quite limited "
(IO)" What? "
(They)" You humans do the same thing. We constructed a narrow your closet with lots of important things (almost all from the past) and try to live there, with all those useless things, while trying to feel at ease. So faced in the closet will never entrrare something bigger than the closet itself. Your I am. But I come out of the closet there is a much larger, we would say endless, that you refuse to see. "
(IO)" And I'm like this? "
(They)" Of course! How many certainties have defended so far? Certainties are those that we have prevented it from receiving information that now receive from us. You see, we who are not able or high, as you say to someone to impress. You are always and only you who decide to be more or less of what you are now. And we adapt accordingly, you should also consider that we can not tell you anything that you can not believe or do not want to hear you say "
(IO)" But you adapt to so if you like me how did you predict the future or give me the names of people that I met? How can you give me examples of this in reality that if I do not really know her? "
(They)" I'll have already said several times ... but you're a bit 'slow to learn. All of these things outside of your closet to know already. Omniscience is talking about your friend (Lester Levenson) and the way we talk about it seems very appropriate. You already know. You all know why it all out of the closet will extend throughout the universe and you have no space or time. However, you always afraid of losing your many little things that you are loyal and even the closet where you normally live for you is a great comfort and hence will not exit if not for some big problem or because someone else makes you feel at a seminar quite safe. "
(IO)" It is clear to me. What are the things in the closet? "
(They)" You call them crudely thought-forms in the subconscious or memory. Someone else calls him unconscious. The fact is that it is a store of which you have no need and that if you decide can be lightened, polished ... and why do not you do it? "
(IO)" Why? "
(They)" Why is your feeling that I will die if he gets rid of all these things. For example, if you stop to think that you need three meals a day (you do not need) and you can live on only water and sunlight, the first thing to be deepening the sense of hunger and the thought of what will others think seeing that they eat more. This cluster of habits that you call I looked in the mirror is a beast that tries not to die and why you would keep it close. But this desire is the work of this sort of monster. Almost all the wishes you think you are her work and you look in the mirror and say 'I am ...'. But not you ... you understand? "
(IO disconsolately ...)" ... yes ... "
(They)" You have done for more than 15 years a life that really interest you and you define yourself through some 'passion'. You said 'I love rock'. 'I love to dance'. And so on. But now that I'm dead, many of those things you do not like anymore and you realize that you loved to be alone and instead go for long walks. Then even that Self has died and you found out you loved the readings of mystical mold. But we ask. What 'I' are you? "
(I. .. increasingly dejected)" I do not know ... there is an IO? a Me? an Andrea? "
(They)" Finally a question intelligent. You understand that all problems of the world, your friends and acquaintances, there are because they are defending something that does not exist and that could eradicate being much more free and happy? There is no I or me that is eternal and unchanging. In fact there is Andrea but only a heap of information of thoughts, habits and trends that I like to call you. To date Andrew has this set of things that have created such a sensation Andrea to exist and to be separated and a certain kind of reality and experience, but all this can be changed. "
(IO)" So also the fact that vivo depends on my sense of self? "
(They)" do not 'it depends'. The two sides are of a single medal. The interior and exterior are interconnected and interdependent and are lying on balance the thing. But all this makes you as Minimum terror. We know that many of you are afraid to give up this example that I could get some kind of dementia or apathy, but this is not a trick of the IO to leave and not free you from the narrow closet. The temperament is not destiny. Above all, there's only one thing in the world, even your character or your thoughts, that is truly yours. Everything that you let yourself go, free energy and change your life for the better because you are nothing but the sum total of the think-emotions-feelings accumulated during your countless lives. So whenever you find yourself saying I always ask ME? IO who? "
0 comments:
Post a Comment